Leveraging Continuation Type Patent Applications to Strengthen Patent Portfolios

Many business owners use continuation-type applications to strengthen their patent portfolios and broaden their scope of patent protection. In the lifecycle of a U.S. patent application, strategic decisions about how and when to pursue related filings can make a significant difference in the scope of protection ultimately achieved. Among the most powerful tools available to applicants are continuation, divisional, continuation-in-part (CIP), and bypass applications. Each serves a distinct purpose and can be leveraged to extend patent protection, adjust claim scope, or preserve rights as the underlying invention evolves. Understanding the nuanced benefits of these application types is essential for businesses and inventors seeking to secure and maintain a competitive edge.

What is a Continuation Patent Application?

A continuation application is filed while the original (parent) application is still pending and claims the same invention disclosed in the parent. The applicant uses a continuation to pursue different claims based on the same specification. This is particularly advantageous when the applicant wants to refine the claim strategy—perhaps in response to prior art cited during prosecution—or when market needs shift and new claim sets become commercially relevant. Continuations provide a mechanism for staying in the patent system, often colloquially referred to as “keeping the family alive,” allowing further prosecution without losing the benefit of the original filing date.

What is a Divisional Patent Application?

In contrast, a divisional application is also filed during the pendency of the parent but is used when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues a restriction requirement, asserting that the original application includes multiple distinct inventions. The applicant must elect one invention for examination but retains the right to pursue the non-elected invention(s) through a divisional. This preserves the filing date for all distinct inventions disclosed in the parent and prevents potential loss of rights due to unity-of-invention constraints. A properly timed divisional ensures that important technological variations or related embodiments remain protectable under separate patents.

What is a Continuation-In-Part Patent Application?

A continuation-in-part (CIP) application differs fundamentally in that it introduces new subject matter not present in the parent. It is filed during the pendency of the original application, but the CIP includes both the original disclosure and newly added material. Claims supported by the original disclosure maintain the earlier filing date, while claims relying on the new material receive the CIP filing date. This dual-dated structure can be particularly useful when an invention evolves during development and testing. However, CIPs must be approached with caution: the inclusion of new subject matter can complicate prosecution and create potential issues with prior art, particularly under the post-America Invents Act (AIA) legal framework.

What is a Bypass Patent Application?

Finally, a bypass application is a procedural tool unique to international filings. When a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application designating the United States enters the national phase, applicants may choose either the traditional national stage under 35 U.S.C. § 371 or the bypass route via a continuation or CIP application under 35 U.S.C. § 111(a). A bypass continuation allows the applicant to reframe the claims and maintain procedural flexibility, often providing a cleaner prosecution path. In some cases, applicants prefer this route to avoid the formality-laden national stage process or to take advantage of streamlined USPTO procedures for continuation filings.

Taken together, these various types of continuing applications offer applicants tactical and strategic benefits. Whether the goal is to extend prosecution opportunities, divide inventions for independent protection, incorporate new innovations, or optimize the U.S. national phase of an international filing, these tools provide essential flexibility within the patent system. Careful consideration of which type to file—and when—can significantly affect the strength and scope of a patent portfolio. For clients navigating complex patent landscapes, a thoughtful continuation strategy is not merely a procedural option; it is a competitive imperative.

Our firm can help with creating a patent portfolio strategy to maximum your patent protection that is aligned with your goals. Click HERE to learn more about Derek Fahey, Esq., the author of this article.